pennsylvania education spending

Pa. Education Spending Soars to All-Time High

Key Points

  • Pennsylvania school district spending per student increased to $19,900 in 2020–21.
  • State support of public education is up 40 percent over the last decade, reaching an all-time high of $13.3 billion in 2021–22.
  • Pennsylvania exceeds national averages for local, state, and federal per pupil spending on public schools and ranks 8th in the nation for total per student public-school funding.
  • School districts are stockpiling taxpayer resources. Far from underfunded, Pennsylvania school districts have over $5.29 billion in general reserve funds and another $5.46 billion (includes charter schools and other public schools) in unspent federal pandemic aid still sitting in the treasury.

Increasing Education Spending

Over the last decade, taxpayer spending on Pennsylvania public schools has consistently increased, reaching all-time highs year after year.

  • Pennsylvania per pupil funding for public schools increased in 2020–21, according to newly released data from the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE).[1] This spending increase occurred before Pennsylvania distributed most of its pandemic federal aid and what Gov. Tom Wolf termed the “largest public school funding increase in state history” in the 2021–22 budget.
    • Total public-school district spending from all sources (local, state, and federal) increased to $33.67 billion in 2020–21, up 32 percent since 2013.
    • Average, statewide funding per student increased to $19,919 in 2020–21, up 33.9 percent since 2013.
  • The Pennsylvania state budget raised state support of public schools to $13.32 billion, with a $500 million increase in 2021–22.[2] State support of public schools has increased 40 percent since 2013 and by $3.25 billion since Wolf took office.

Outspending the Nation

Pennsylvania ranks among the highest spending states on public education.

  • At nearly $20,000 per student, Pennsylvania spends almost $4,000 more than the national average. The commonwealth’s spending per student exceeds the national average for every funding source—federal, state, and local.[3]
  • As of fiscal year 2020 (the most recent data available), Pennsylvania ranks 8th in total per student funding, 7th in local per student funding, and 25th in state per student funding.
  • Taxpayer-funded lobbyists who advocate for more spending claim that Pennsylvania’s “state share” of public school funding is relatively low. Yet, this is a meaningless metric given:
    • Pennsylvania’s state funding for public schools on a per student basis exceeds the national average. The “state share” as a percentage is lower only because Pennsylvania’s local funding (i.e., school property taxes) is so high.
    • That is, 38 percent of $20,000 (Pennsylvania’s state share of per pupil spending) is more than 47 percent of $16,000 (the average state share of per pupil spending).
    • Pennsylvania could increase its “state share of funding” ranking by capping local property taxes and keeping overall spending at the national average.

Stockpiling Reserve Funds

While some rainy-day funds are important for weathering unforeseen events, school districts have excessive stockpiles of taxpayer resources.

  • PDE data reveals that public school districts collectively stockpiled $5.29 billion in reserve funds in 2020-21, up 32.7 percent since 2013.[4]
  • School district reserves consist of assigned, unassigned, and committed funds. While the intent for assigned funds may be for capital improvements, reserve funds are fungible, which allows school districts to repurpose their use.
  • The state’s previous Auditor General recommended that reserve funds be no more than 20 percent of the school district’s total spending.[5] Remarkably, almost half of Pennsylvania school districts—239 out of the 500 districts—have reserve funds that exceed 20 percent of their spending.
  • Pennsylvania school districts, on average, have reserve funds equaling 22.56 percent of their total spending. In contrast, the state rainy day fund contains a mere 7 percent of our commonwealth’s budget in 2021–22.[6]

Hoarding Federal Money

Calls for increases in state education funding come even as public schools sit on billions of unspent federal aid. This leftover federal money is in addition to the billions school districts hold in general reserves.

  • Since 2019, Pennsylvania public schools were granted more than $6.7 billion in federal pandemic aid through three packages: Federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act (CRRSA), and American Rescue Plan (ARP).
  • As of May 2022, Pennsylvania public schools (including district and charter schools) still have $5.46 billion in unspent federal pandemic aid.[7]

Tracking Spending and Student Enrollment

  • Pennsylvania’s spending on public schools keeps increasing as school district enrollment falls. While state aid to public schools has increased 40 percent since 2013, school district enrollment has decreased 7 percent. The largest dip in school district enrollment occurred after 2019–20, following the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, with almost 51,000 students leaving school districts.[8]
  • In Philadelphia alone, more than 9,000 students, or 7.5 percent, have left the school district since the start of the pandemic.

Tracking Spending and Student Performance

While spending on public schools has soared, student performance still lags—with 78 percent of Pennsylvania eighth-grade students not proficient in math and 47 percent not proficient in language arts.[9] Simply increasing taxpayer funding to public schools does not improve academic results.

  • A 2022 report on the PDE’s performance by the Independent Fiscal Office found that “the data suggests there is little or no correlation between the current expenditures spent per student and the share of students that score proficient or above on standardized tests.”[10]
  • Dr. Eric Hanushek of Stanford University found that “the available evidence suggests that there is no relationship between expenditures and the achievement of students.” Hanushek has also examined the impact of education funding adequacy lawsuits in other states. His book with Alfred Lindseth, an attorney and author with Education Next, notes that even when these lawsuits succeed (i.e., the courts ordered more spending on public schools), academic performance does not improve.[11]
  • A 2014 nationwide study, by the Cato Institute, examined the correlation between state school spending and academic performance over a 40-year time period. The research reveals “essentially no link between state education spending (which has exploded) and the performance of students at the end of high school (which has generally stagnated or declined).”[12]

[1]Pennsylvania Department of Education, AFR Data Files, 2020–21,

[2]Pennsylvania Department of Education, Summary of State Appropriations for Education, 2022–23,

[3]National Center for Education Statistics, “Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: FY 20”, May 2022,

[4]Pennsylvania Department of Education, AFR Data Detailed, General Fund Balance 2020-21,

[5]Jan Murphy, “School districts reserve funds continue to grow, amassing $4.3.billion in 2014-15, June 2016,

[6]Pennsylvania Treasury, “Treasurer Garrity Announces Transfer of $2.6 billion to the Rainy Day Fund,” September 2021,

[7]Pa. Treasury Accounting Bureau, Status of Appropriation, Year to Date through Accounting Period 11 and Fiscal Year 2021, “COVID-ESSER-LEA”, May 2022 report,

[8]Pennsylvania Department of Education, Enrollment Reports,

[9]Pennsylvania Department of Education, PSSA Results 2021,

[10]Independent Fiscal Office, Performance Based Budget, Department of Education, January 2022,

[11]Eric Hanushek, “Throwing Money at Schools,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Autumn 1981,; Eric Hanushek and Alfred Lindseth, Schoolhouses, Courthouses, and Statehouses: Solving the Funding-Achievement Puzzle in America’s Public Schools, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009).

[12]Andrew Coulson, “State Education Trends: Academic Performance and Spending over the Past 40 years,” March 2014, Cato Institute,