I know it will never happen — just like asking him to pass on a greasy cheese steak sub — but Gov. Rendell should reject the federal “spendulus” money. He should view it as the stolen cash it is — stolen from our children and our children’s children. But, alas, he won’t pass up the “free” money. He’l’ spend it all, and then some.
Of course, there’s no such thing as free money. But too few people are asking who is going to pay for it. “David Cameron” did. That’s his nom de plume because he works a little too close to the political mischief in
Governors in states like South Carolina,
S.C. Gov. Mark Sanford is thinking about the long-term consequences of building his state budget on one-time infusions of federal money. He said, “You get this huge slug of money. It funds programs for a couple of years, and then what? You get it started, you get a constituency established, and then we’re supposed to yank the rug out from under people when the federal money runs out?”
But that, I believe, is the intended purpose of this spendulus plan. Cameron agrees that this part of the unspoken plan will increase government spending for decades to come.
Here’s how it will work in
First, the state is projecting a deficit of $2.3 billion, bringing projected state revenues down to $25.9 billion for FY 2008-09. But with the infusion of $3.5 billion of “free” federal money, Rendell plans to both fill the current budget-deficit gap and spend even more money next year — to the tune of nearly $29 billion, an increase of nearly 12 percent during an economic downturn.
But what happens when that one-time infusion of $3.5 billion is spent? You got it, Rendell declares another revenue crisis and tells all you working stiffs out there that we need to raise your taxes, otherwise weâ€™ll be destroying all those jobs government just “created.”
This is how you turn temporary “stimulus” spending into permanent and massive government spending. The result, unfortunately, will be significantly higher taxes, significantly deeper deficits, and much slower economic growth. But at least we might be able to move to
Was that the kind of stimulus you were expecting?