Top Stories
Top Stories Top Stories

Energy Policy

  •  

JULY 9, 2010 | Commentary by PAUL CHESSER

PennFuture: Harrisburg's Lobbying Launderers

According to its website, PennFuture claims to have secured stronger pollution rules in state agencies; convinced legislators to pass several laws; won $80 million in utility rate cases; and convinced Gov. Ed Rendell and the general public to support a bond issue for environmental funding. Yet for all these accomplishments - most of which it attributes to the help of its faithful supporters - PennFuture reported spending zero dollars on grassroots lobbying between 2004 through 2007.

JULY 8, 2010 | News Release by COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION

PennFuture’s Hypocritcal, Unethical, and Possibly Illegal Lobbying

Report identifies activities of nonprofit eco-activist group

Chesser's report, PennFuture's Lobbying: Hypocritical, Unethical, and Possibly Illegal, describes how the eco-activist organization received nearly $1 million during the last five years from alternative energy companies. 

"These alternative energy companies benefited from PennFuture's lobbying for corporate tax breaks and taxpayer-funded ‘economic development' funds," writes Chesser.  "Yet the group reported to the Internal Revenue Service that it spent no money on grassroots lobbying on four of its past five tax returns."

JULY 8, 2010 | Policy Brief by PAUL CHESSER

PennFuture's Lobbying

Hypocritical, unethical, and possibly illegal

PennFuture lobbying 071210

PennFuture (a.k.a. Citizens for Pennsylvania's Future), the organization founded by Pennsylvania Secretary of Environmental Protection John Hanger over 10 years ago, frequently criticizes the lobbying by traditional energy industries. But a close look at the environmental activist group shows at least questionable and hypocritical, if not unethical or illegal, advocacy practices.

JUNE 22, 2010 | Commentary by KATRINA CURRIE

The Marcellus Shale: A Real Stimulus

Marcellus Shale: A real stimulus

The Marcellus Shale formation is believed to be the largest unconventional natural gas reservoir in America, and its exploration has been coined a modern-day gold rush. A Penn State study found Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale activity in 2009 created 44,000 direct and indirect jobs and generated almost $400 million in state and local tax revenue. The study predicts the industry will generate over 111,000 jobs and $987 million in state and local tax revenue by 2011. Unfortunately, these positive developments could be eroded if additional taxes and regulations are imposed.

JUNE 11, 2010 | Testimony by NATHAN BENEFIELD, KATRINA CURRIE

Green Jobs and the Broken Window Fallacy

Testimony to the Pennsylvania House Republican Policy Committee

Green jobs and the broken window fallacy

This concept applies to the "green jobs" craze gripping lawmakers.  Green jobs, i.e., jobs in wind, solar, and other alternative energies, are in and of themselves a good thing.  But when government attempts to pick winners and losers-by identifying which industries are "green" or "good" and subsidizing them at taxpayers' expense, mandating their use, and even punishing their competitors with costly regulations-it hinders our overall economy.  Jobs created in industries that depend on government assistance are not sustainable, will not stimulate the economy, and will not result in net job growth.

JUNE 8, 2010 | Policy Brief by KATRINA CURRIE, ELIZABETH STELLE

Pennsylvania's Natural Gas Boom

Economic & Environmental Impacts

Pennsylvania natural gas tax Commonwealth Foundation policy brief

The Marcellus Shale formation is believed to be the largest unconventional natural gas reservoir in America, and its exploration has been coined a modern-day gold rush. More than a mile underground, this once unreachable gas is now recoverable thanks to advancements in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technology.

 

 

MAY 12, 2010 | Commentary by KATRINA CURRIE

Green Jobs Destroy Good Jobs

With Pennsylvania's unemployment rate at a 25-year high, Gov. Rendell is pushing "green jobs" at every turn. He has doled out nearly $1 billion to renewable energy projects and wants additional alternative energy mandates. In reality, these mandates and subsidies will result in a net loss of jobs and necessarily escalate electricity prices.

MAY 11, 2010 | News Release by COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION

Special Interests Denounce "Special Interests"

The Commonwealth Foundation expressed disappointment today that special interest groups which demand taxpayer subsidies for certain energy companies are attacking Pennsylvania's natural gas companies for simply wanting to be treated like other energy producers.

MAY 4, 2010 | Commentary by PAUL CHESSER

Pennsylvania’s Unrealistic Climate Plan

PA Climate Plan

A macroeconomic study of Pennsylvania's Climate Action Plan, released earlier this month, promises impressive cost savings and job creation for the state, but the report was produced by a global warming alarmist group that is riddled with conflicts of interest and lacks integrity in its analyses.

MARCH 23, 2010 | Commentary by ELIZABETH STELLE

Natural Gas Severance Tax: Still A Bad Idea

In the coming months, debate on a proposed natural gas severance tax will heat up as legislators attempt to pass a balanced budget before June 30. Last year, lawmakers and Governor Rendell decided that a tax would cripple the emerging industry. Facing another budget shortfall, Governor Rendell has now decided drilling companies can afford to pay and additional tax- but the harmful effects remain unchanged.

Total Records: 44

 
Next 10

Media Requests

Media contact:
Jay Ostrich, Director of Public Affairs

(O) 717-671-1901

Who are We?

The Commonwealth Foundation is Pennsylvania's free-market think tank.  The Commonwealth Foundation crafts free-market policies, convinces Pennsylvanians of their benefits, and counters attacks on liberty.

Commonwealth Foundation PolicyBlog

Senate Votes on Natural Gas Tax (HB1950)

February 8

On Tuesday, February 7, 2012, the Pennsylvania Senate passed HB 1950 Conference Committee Report by a 31-19 margin with 26 Republicans and 5 Democrats FOR it and 4 Republicans and 15 Democrats AGAINST it. Alloway (R) Y Kasunic (D) Y Washington (D) N Argall (R) Y ...

Commonwealth Foundation Twitter Updates

Browse Commonwealth Foundation