Recent Research
MAY 20, 2011 | Policy Points by COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION
Pennsylvania Welfare Spending & Medicaid
Gov. Tom Corbett's proposed FY 2011-12 budget would represent the first time General Fund spending on the Department of Public Welfare would exceed that for the Department of Education.
JANUARY 17, 2011 | Policy Report by COMMONWEALTH FOUNDATION
80 Ideas for a Prosperous Pennsylvania
A Blueprint for Transforming the Commonwealth
Pennsylvania must undergo a rapid transformation to reverse the poor policy decisions that have eroded economic freedoms and brought the state to its present condition. To provide a roadmap for success in this critical endeavor, the Commonwealth Foundation has compiled a list of 80 policy recommendations for Gov. Corbett and state legi
JANUARY 11, 2011 | Policy Report by STEPHEN A. MOSES
Long-Term Care Reform
More Access to Better Care at Lower Costs
Long-term care is very expensive whether provided in a nursing home, an assisted living facility, or in someone's home. Medicaid pays for most professional long-term care (LTC) in Pennsylvania. LTC currently costs Pennsylvania taxpayers $6.6 billion per year, making up 40% of all Medicaid spending (much higher than the national average)
Recent Blog Posts
DECEMBER 22, 2011
No Rush on Health Insurance Exchanges
In late November the Department of Insurance announced that Pennsylvania would begin implementing a state health insurance exchange as laid out in PPACA (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act). The judgment was made after a series of hearings around the state and a study conducted by KPMG.
There is little reason for the administration to rush to implement a state exchange until the Supreme Court decides the fate of PPACA. The next federal government deadline for implementation grants was recently extended from December 2011 to June 2012—after the Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of PPACA. If Obamacare is struck down, there is no reason to implement a government-run exchange.
A state health insurance exchange cannot be implemented without enabling legislation, and it doesn't appear that HB 627 or SB 940 are going to be a legislative priority anytime soon.
The following links contain good information about state exchanges:
- Should Missouri Create a Health Insurance Exchange?—Cato Institute (summary available here)
- Obamacare 'Exchange' Opposite of 'Free Market'—Mackinac Center
- Ten Reasons Why Arizona Must Reject Exchanges—Goldwater Institute
- Health Insurance Exchanges: What If They Issued 347 Pages of Regulations and Nobody Cared?— Pacific Research Institute
- Why Health Exchanges Don't Work— Pacific Research Institute
posted by ELIZABETH STELLE | 00:38 PM | 0 comment
DECEMBER 9, 2011
How Much Will Obamacare Cost You?
The federal health care overhaul will be paid for with spending cuts and an estimated $420 billion in new taxes. How much of that $420 billion will come out of your pocket? The Tax Foundation's new Health Care Tax calculator has the answer.
The calculator covers nine new taxes in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act—the Cadillac tax on generous policies, the 10 percent tanning tax, the tax on HSA disbursements, the medical devices tax and more—some of which don't kick in until 2018.
The calculator provides your total tax burden along with the burden for each individual tax. But that's not the total cost of the health care law. Creator Nick Kasprak explains;
. . .the impact of the individual and employer mandates, which are designed to change consumer behavior rather than raise revenue, need to be considered in addition to direct tax costs, as well as spending cuts to Medicare Advantage.
In other words, your calculated tax burden doesn't account for a variety of unintended consequences, such as an increase in premiums thanks to new mandates or the rise in Medicaid enrollment. While we now know what is in the bill, the full cost of PPACA is still unknown.
posted by ELIZABETH STELLE | 01:15 PM | 0 comment
SEPTEMBER 22, 2011
Changing the Incentives in Medicaid
Medicaid spending is set to skyrocket under the federal health care overhaul in the next two years, but it already consumes 31 percent of Pennsylvania's budget. It is no surprise that the Department of Public Welfare is looking for ways to make the program, known for providing expensive and low-quality care, more cost-effective.
Last week, Welfare Secretary Gary Alexander revealed the department is looking at a form of Reverse Health Savings Accounts for Medicaid beneficiaries.
We are looking at a model to save hundreds of millions of dollars by steering Medicaid beneficiaries to the most cost-effective settings. To reward beneficiaries we would give them some incentive. . . so if the state saves $1,000 on a medical procedure we may give the beneficiary $100 or $200 as a reward.
Reverse Health Savings Accounts encourage enrollees to use health care services more discriminately. For instance, beneficiaries would be rewarded for using a primary physician for non-life threatening illnesses instead of a hospital emergency room.
According to health experts, this specific approach has never been tried in a state before, but adjusting patient incentives so they use health care effectively is nothing new. We recommended this approach nearly three years ago. Unlike more comprehensive reforms, such as block grants or waivers, this reform is very achievable since it doesn't appear to need federal approval.
posted by ELIZABETH STELLE | 01:45 PM | 0 comment

RSS FEEDS





