Remember the time lawmakers from both parties came together in Harrisburg and unanimously passed important, groundbreaking reform legislation?
It's not a joke. It happened in 2012.
As a result of research and advocacy efforts by a transpartisan coalition including the Commonwealth Foundation, the late Democratic Gov. George Leader's family, the ACLU, and many others, the Pennsylvania General Assembly passed a landmark corrections reform package.
The goals of this bipartisan legislation were many: to better differentiate between violent and nonviolent offenders, and treat them accordingly; to reduce prison population and recidivism rates while keeping the public safe; and to save taxpayers millions of dollars by investing in a smarter, safer, more humane corrections system.
Now, nearly three years later, the reforms appear to be working: The latest data show historic lows in recidivism in Pennsylvania and real taxpayer savings.
According to the Department of Corrections, the most recent six-month and three-year recidivism rates are the lowest the department has ever recorded, while one-year rates are second-lowest in Department history. These rates are the result of smarter and more humane corrections policies, which improve lives and lead to savings for taxpayers, as my colleague Elizabeth Stelle has previously pointed out.
Unprecedented reductions in the prison population, $69.9 million in taxpayer savings, and lower recidivism rates all indicate that the 2012 corrections reforms are working.
Earlier this month Don Gilliland over at the Tribune Review chronicled some of the big accomplishments of the two-year-old initiative to get smart on crime:
The drop in prison population in 2014 'was the largest one-year drop in our population since 1971, and only the fourth time in the past 40 years that our population has shown an annual decrease, rather than an increase,' said Bret Bucklen, Corrections' director of planning, research and statistics.
The state ended the calendar year with 50,756 inmates. Four years ago, the prison population was expected to top more than 56,000 inmates by the end of 2014.
My colleague Nate Benefield points out that fewer prisoners means no new guards to hire, no new prisons to build and no need to pay other states to board our prisoners (which we did in 2009). All of those developments mean big savings for taxpayers.
The drop in inmates avoided approximately $69.9 million in costs in 2014 alone, and a total of $222 million during Corbett's four-year tenure, according to estimates from the department.
Overall, the corrections budget for 2015-16 is still set to increase, thanks to rising pension costs for corrections officers, but the overall fiscal situation is much more manageable today thanks to the actions taken two years ago.
And the final bit of good news? Governor Wolf's decision to retain Secretary of Corrections John Wetzel indicates the reforms will continue improve both the quality and cost-efficiency of our prison system.
Criminal justice policy that offers less spending, lower crime and improved outcomes for offenders—too good to be true? Actually, that is the result of recent corrections reforms in Pennsylvania and other states.
So, it's no surprise the federal government wants to follow our lead. Citing Pennsylvania, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder announced a change in policy at the Justice Department that mirrors reforms signed by Gov. Corbett last year.
These new policies focus on keeping low-level, nonviolent drug offenders out of expensive prisons. Holder noted, as did a transpartisan coalition Commonwealth Foundation was part of, that long prison sentences often don't reduce crime but do make offenders more likely to commit violent crime after release.
Instead, being "smart on crime" means addressing small crimes immediately and supporting corrections programs that work effectively in communities—not relying on maximum security prisons. These programs have proven to be cost effective and to reduce recidivism and crime rates.
This type of bottom-up, innovative reform allows the federal government to pattern a nation policy on states that have already proven its effectiveness: Federalism really does work.
Here's to the Obama administration learning from the successes of Pennsylvania and other reform-minded states!
On the heels of Pennsylvania's historic decline in prison population—the largest one-year decline in four decades—the Department of Corrections announced today the imminent closure of two older prisons. This will save taxpayers an estimated $23 million next year.
This welcome news follows landmark bipartisan corrections reform in Pennsylvania that replaces decades of ineffective and expensive corrections policies with reforms that make our communities safer and save taxpayers money. Such savings and prison closures represent an unequivocal victory for taxpayers, inmates and corrections workers alike.
SCI Cresson (Cambria County) and SCI Greensburg (Westmoreland County), the two institutions to be closed, are older, less secure facilities that can house fewer inmates at higher operating costs relative to their newer counterparts, like the new facility at Benner Township. In addition, the new institutions offer a more efficient and more secure design, making them safer for inmates and residents.
Employees who are willing to relocate within the corrections system will be offered a new job. The entire taxpayer savings is the result of finding efficiencies within the corrections system.
The Commonwealth Foundation has long been part of a transpartisan coalition for corrections reform inspired by former Democratic Gov. George M. Leader, and we continue to stand with Gov. Corbett, Sec. Wetzel, and the unanimous consent of the General Assembly in their efforts to provide criminal justice reform that reduces costs to taxpayers and reduces crime.
Late last month, the Independent Fiscal Office released its annual report looking at Pennsylvania's economy and forecasting state budget expenditures and revenues. The trends remain alarming.
Most notably, state government is spending more than it is collecting in revenue this year (using remaining surpluses to fill in the gap), and that shortfall is set to widen in future years. The general fund gap will reach $2.2 billion by 2017-18.
This shortfall will be driven by dramatic increases in pension contributions (which will also affect school districts and local governments), Medicaid costs, and debt payments.
As intimidating as that seems, the IFO forecasts assume "current policy"—things will likely get worse. For starters, the IFO assumes spending in discretionary areas like education and transportation will only change with population and inflation; any additional spending lawmakers want will add to those deficits. And the IFO does not include the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, which could cost the commonwealth upwards of another $5 billion over the next few years.
On the bright side, the IFO forecasts corrections spending—one of the "four alarms" we've been highlighting—will slow and shrink as a share of the budget over the next five years thanks to landmark corrections reform enacted this year.
Lawmakers must tackle unsustainable pension and welfare spending with the same sort of bipartisan solutions before Pennsylvania's budgetary fire becomes an inferno, and families and business are burned with massive tax hikes.
On Tuesday, Pennsylvania passed the final piece, House Bill 135, of a landmark corrections reform package that transforms our ailing prison system to one that works better for YOU.
Commonwealth Foundation applauds Gov. Tom Corbett and Sec. Wetzel for their leadership and thanks House and Senate members for their unanimous bipartisan support for real corrections reform via SB 100 and HB 135.
Over the past 30 years, Pennsylvania's incarceration rate exploded more than 500 percent to over 50,000 inmates. As a result, taxpayers spend 17 times as much on the Department of Corrections today as they did in 1980. At a cost of $35,000 per inmate per year, it is not a stretch to say taxpayers have been ill served by a system that locks up more people for longer periods, but fails to deter future crimes.
Here's a look at how these reforms offer a new 21st Century vision for criminal justice and provides better outcomes for taxpayers, communities and offenders:
- Taxpayers: The reforms are projected to save more than $250 million within five years. States such as New York and Texas have embraced similar policy changes, saving tax dollars while significantly reducing both their crime and imprisonment rates.
- Communities: Part of the savings will be used to create a more effective correctional system and safer communities. These programs encourage smarter policing procedures, such as "hot spot" policing and proven practices to reduce the number of repeat offenders.
- Offenders: Provides funding and utilizes more efficient communication technology to increase parole hearing capacity. Currently, system inefficiencies and lack of capacity have resulted in 1,900 inmates locked up in prison when they would otherwise qualify for parole. This costs taxpayers more than $66 million per year.
We here at CF are proud to be part, along with Gov. George M. Leader, his family, and many others, of a transpartisan coalition favoring "real corrections reform, right now." We are pleased these reforms provide meaningful changes to save tax dollars while improving public safety.
Under Gov. Tom Corbett's leadership, Pennsylvania unanimously passed (Senate Bill 100) part of a landmark corrections reform package last session.
SB 100, now Act 122 of 2012, aims to reduce both crime and imprisonment rates in Pennsylvania, while providing upwards of $300 million in savings over the next five years. The bill's effectiveness, however, depends on passing HB 135—currently stuck in the Senate—which would reinvest a portion of the savings in programs that create a more cost effective and smarter correctional system.
- The programs waiting to be funded would encourage smarter policing procedures, whether it be "hot spot" policing, or improving parole procedures. The bill also funds programs aimed at reducing the number of repeat offenders.
- One of the key programs funded through HB 135 is a county diversion program that ensures counties have the resources to handle nonviolent offenders with short sentences locally, instead of sending them to costly state prisons where they can be influenced by hardened criminals.
Together, Act 22 and HB 135 allow us the opportunity to reinvest a small portion of our savings to ensure long term savings, along with making our state a safer place.
However, unlike baseball, 1 for 2 is not a good batting average. The legislature should make passing HB 135 a priority this fall.
On Monday, Pennsylvania passed landmark legislation to replace decades of ineffective and expensive corrections policies with reforms that make our communities safer and save taxpayers money.
Commonwealth Foundation thanks House and Senate members for their unanimous bipartisan support for real corrections reform via Senate Bill 100.
While Senate Bill 100 heads to the governor's desk, a separate component, House Bill 135, needs to accompany it. As Brad Bumsted of the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reports:
House Bill 135, pending in the Senate Appropriations Committee, would authorize the state to send some of the savings to counties. Together, the Senate and House bills make up the so-called Justice Reinvestment Initiative, backed by a coalition of conservatives and liberals.
If both bills are passed together, the net savings is projected to reach $253 million within five years. States such as New York and Texas have embraced similar policy changes, significantly reducing both their crime and imprisonment rates over the past decade. These states demonstrate that corrections reform can improve public safety while saving tax dollars.
While SB 100 was a critical arrow to fire at corrections reforms, HB 135 is the arrowhead that will ensure Pennsylvania hits the target of improving public safety while saving tax dollars.
- Make the corrections system more efficient by improving the parole process and keeping low-risk cases out of prison in favor of less expensive and more effective sentencing;
- Save taxpayer dollars;
- And improve public safety by reducing reoffending rates and reinvesting a portion of the savings back into the correctional system to bolster county corrections, law enforcement, and parole supervision.
However, these reforms need to happen as a package to be effective.
The reform package was split into two separate pieces of legislation.
Senate Bill 100 initiates smarter sentencing and parole practices that will save the commonwealth more than $1 million in fiscal year 2012-13, with substantial savings in subsequent years.
- Within five years, the net saving is projected to reach $253 million.
- SB 100 is scheduled for a concurrence vote in the Senate this week.
House Bill 135 will be the vehicle (firewall) for reinvesting a portion of the savings achieved in SB 100 back into effective corrections-related programs and to counties to help reduce Pennsylvania's prison population. Failing to pass both pieces limits effectiveness and delays significant savings.
- HB 135 would provide counties necessary funding to keep nonviolent offenders with short minimum sentences in local jails instead of state prisons. This is both more effective and cost efficient, leading to substantial savings.
- HB 135 will allow funds for evidence-based probation supervision practices, such as programs modeled after Hawaii's Opportunity Probation with Enforcement (HOPE). This innovative probation program provides swift, predictable sanctions on probation violators. It reduced positive drug tests in Hawaii by more than 70 percent and cut new arrests in half. Without the funding under HB 135, few counties are likely to utilize HOPE courts.
- HB 135 is in the Senate Appropriations committee.
To achieve meaningful corrections reform, both pieces of legislation should be sent to Gov. Tom Corbett's desk by June 30.
For more information on these proven reforms, visit www.commonwealthfoundation.org/justice
What is it they say about things that are out of sight? Oh, yes, out of mind. That might be one of the reasons why our corrections system has become one of our Four Alarms, with skyrocketing costs in both taxpayer dollars and human capital. But the good news, as highlighted in this Philadelphia Inquirer story on Gov. George Leader, is that real corrections reform could be just around the corner.
Last week, Michael Geer of the Pennsylvania Family Council and I wrote to our state Representatives to encourage them to support the bi-partisan efforts to give us a more efficient and more effective corrections system. The message is that you can be smart on crime and not sacrifice safety. Indeed, no one is suggesting that we not punish people who have committed a crime. And there are some real bad people who should never get out of jail. But we are saying that there are proven ways to provide both punishment AND correction in less costly and better ways.
Here's our letter urging support for this critical and path-breaking legislation under consideration this week in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives:
It is our pleasure to write you on behalf of the Commonwealth Foundation and Pennsylvania Family Council to encourage you to support Senate Bill 100 (printer number 2258) as amended by the House Judiciary Committee last week.
Pennsylvania's growing and expensive corrections system can do better for communities, taxpayers and offenders. SB 100 helps do this by replacing Pennsylvania's ineffective corrections policies with those that lower crime rates, reduce recidivism, and control spending.
SB 100 embraces the following three evidence-based principles:
- Keep Low-Risk Cases Out of Prisons. Research indicates that while imprisonment keeps offenders from committing crimes in the outside community, it does not deter crimes after release, and may even make low-risk offenders more likely to commit future crimes.
- Reduce Recidivism. Inmates must be rehabilitated by addressing behavioral and substance abuse issues. Nearly 45 percent of Pennsylvania offenders return to prison after three years. A significant factor is technical parole or probation violations such as breaking curfew, not new crimes.
- Fund Results, Not Just Punishments. Criminal justice reforms should protect citizens, lower crime rates, and control spending.
Reforming our state corrections system is not being soft on crime - it's being smart on crime. Over the past 30 years, Pennsylvania's incarceration rate exploded by more than 500 percent to more than 50,000 inmates. As a result, taxpayers spend 17 times as much on the Department of Corrections today as they did in 1980. At a cost of $35,000 per inmate per year, it is not a stretch to say taxpayers have been ill served by a system that locks up more people for longer periods, but fails to deter future crimes.
The good news is that we can spend less and get better results through real corrections reform, right now. Please support Senate Bill 100 in its current form.
Matthew J. Brouillette, President & CEO
Michael Geer, President
Pennsylvania Family Institute
Pennsylvania Family Council
Total Records: 36
Who are We?
The Commonwealth Foundation is Pennsylvania's free-market think tank. The Commonwealth Foundation transforms free-market ideas into public policies so all Pennsylvanians can flourish.