In 2007, the Philadelphia Youth Network needed to cut 1,100 jobs for inner-city teens. Why? Because they couldn't afford to place as many teens in jobs under the higher minimum wage.
In the end, the organization was able to secure additional funding to maintain job placements, but the experience of Philadelphia Youth Network demonstrates how the minimum wage harms, not helps low-income workers.
Raising the minimum wage is ineffective for two reasons: Most low-income breadwinners do not make the minimum wage and minimum wage hikes actually shrink the number of available jobs.
First of all, the majority of Pennsylvania's minimum and near-minimum wage earners reside in households with an annual income above $40,000 a year. Only 10% of PA min wage earners are single parents who qualify for the federal EITC.
Secondly, minimum wage hikes reduce job opportunities. In 2006, a comprehensive review of more than 100 studies found, in the vast majority of cases, raising the minimum wage increases unemployment for low-wage workers. A 10% increase in a federal or state minimum wage actually decreased employment for black males by 6.5%, according to a 2011 study.
The bottom line is a higher minimum wage makes it harder for employers to offer opportunities to those who need it most.
So how do we help families struggling to make ends meet? A one-percentage point drop in the state's corporate tax rate would increase annual economic growth by 0.1 to 0.2%, leading to higher productivity, which means more jobs and higher wages. Pennsylvania can also scale back professional licensing to give low-wage earners the opportunity to increase their incomes through entrepreneurship.
Advocates for low-wage workers should be pursuing reforms that work, not policies that raise some workers wages at the expense of others.
Pennsylvania’s economy is beginning to recover from the 2007 recession, according to the latest numbers from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Since 2010, Pennsylvania has added 86,400 jobs, ranking 21st among states. In contrast, Pennsylvania added just 41,300 jobs from 2002-2010. This lack of job growth can be attributed to a variety of things including national trends; Pennsylvania's tax burden, which is the 10th highest in the nation; and the state's regulatory environment and growth in government spending—issues which lawmakers need to tackle.
While Pennsylvania employment has not returned to its prerecession peak, the state is slowly making progress. Claims of Pennsylvania ranking near the bottom in job creation during the past few years are widespread but misleading. In fact, the state has ranked poorly in job growth for decades.
Policymakers in Harrisburg should consider reforms to encourage job growth. Here are just a few recommendations from our new report, Blueprint for a Prosperous Pennsylvania:
End Corporate Welfare and Lower the Tax Burden: Pennsylvania will spend approximately $1.6 billion on corporate welfare this fiscal year. Instead of handing out loans, tax credits, and special favors to privileged companies, policymakers should end these programs and use the savings to cut Pennsylvania’s corporate tax rate, which is the second highest in the world.
Enact Welfare Reform: Pennsylvania's welfare budget continues to grow at an unsustainable rate. To prevent burdening Pennsylvanians with even higher taxes, policymakers should crackdown on the fraud and waste inherent in welfare programs, and demand flexibility from the federal government to restructure the welfare system’s incentives, which only hurt those trying to escape poverty.
Enact Spending Limits: In order to put Pennsylvania on a sustainable path, lawmakers should adopt fiscal restraints, such as spending limits for core functions of government. The limits would control the growth of government spending by tying increases to inflation and population growth. Had state spending limits been enacted in 2000, taxpayers could have seen savings of $4,000 per family of four.
Pennsylvanians are losing economic freedom according to the Fraser Institute’s annual report, Economic Freedom of North America 2013. The commonwealth is slowly losing ground ranking 33rd in 2009 and dropping to 40th in the latest study.
The index measures the limitations on economic freedom imposed by all levels of government in the 50 U.S. states and 10 Canadian provinces under three broad categories. Pennsylvania performs poorly in each category:
- Size of government: 48th
- Takings and discriminatory wealth redistribution: 34th
- Labor market freedom: 24th
There are several reasons for Pennsylvania’s abysmal performance. Chief among them is Pennsylvania's growing debt and spending, which has created $47 billion in unfunded pension debt and an estimated $1.2 to $1.4 billion budget deficit.
If policymakers want to improve the lives of Pennsylvanians, focus should be on increasing economic freedom and opportunity by enacting pension reform, slowing the growth of overall spending and reducing the size of government.
For more on how to accomplish these goals, check out our newest report: Blueprint for a Prosperous Pennsylvania.
Did you know that raising the minimum wage harms the low-skilled workers the policy is meant to help?
Or that prevailing wage laws artificially increase the cost of public works projects at the expense of lower taxes or expanded government services?
Associate Professor of Economics Matthew Rousu joins us for a wide-ranging discussion on Pennsylvania's labor policy in our latest Google+ Hangout and podcast.
Matt teaches at Susquehanna University in Selinsgrove, Pa., and has written on economics for Forbes and US News and World Report as well as for Pennsylvania newspapers The Patriot-News and The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Matt helps us rethink the impact of economic policies that seem beneficial on the surface but have unintended negative consequences.
Click here for an audio-only podcast version.
Want to hear more from Professor Rousu? Visit his blog on economic policy at paeconomist.blogspot.com.
Things are looking somewhat up for Pennsylvania’s economy, according to the annual Rich States, Poor States published by ALEC. The 2013 edition ranks Pennsylvania 34th in economic outlook, up from 40th last year and the highest economic ranking since the index’s creation.
Rich States, Poor States considers 15 factors heavily influenced by state policies to predict how a state’s economy will perform. While the commonwealth’s high tax burden and lack of worker freedom continue to hinder growth, a slowdown in state spending and continued phase-out of the capital stock and franchise tax have helped the state move from the bottom third to the middle-of-the pack.
But middle-of-the-pack isn’t good enough. To continue to attract jobs and investment, Pennsylvania will have to tackle big cost drivers like Medicaid and the pension tsunami. Continued tax reforms will help too, such as Governor Corbett’s latest proposal, which we estimate will create more than 2,500 new jobs by 2018 if enacted.
Earlier this week, GE announced plans to move 950 jobs from Erie, Pa. to Texas. What is one of the key reasons Pennsylvania continues to lose jobs and population to states like Texas? Economic freedom.
The Mercatus Center's latest edition of Freedom in the 50 States underlines the problem hindering the opportunities available to Pennsylvanians. The study ranks the Keystone State 31st overall on its freedom index. The reasoning:
The state's ranking remains mediocre on fiscal policy. It has higher-than-average taxes but performs much better than most states on government spending and employment. However, it has high government debt and is not as fiscally decentralized as most states.
Not only are Pennsylvanians taxed too much, but we are neck deep in government debt. The analysis also scored our state below average in business regulations and tort abuse.
Study after study finds that economic freedom results in higher quality of life. States with more economic freedom see higher rates of GDP growth, lower unemployment, and lower levels of state and local debt. Economic freedom also leads to higher incomes, less poverty, better environments, and even longer lives.
This short video from Duquesne University professor and CF Scholar Antony Davies underscores the benefits of economic freedom.
Critics, and likely election challengers, of Gov. Tom Corbett point to the singular fact that the state's unemployment rate is higher than the national average (though not significantly, nor significantly changed from last year). These critics claim this is the result of fiscal restraint in the last two state budgets. But focusing on this one data point ignores the broader economic trends found in the same Bureau of Labor Statistics data.
To begin with, the unemployment rate is determined by calculating the number of "unemployed"—those actively seeking work—by the total labor force (those with jobs plus unemployed). Thus the "unemployment rate" can rise if people lose jobs, or if more people enter the labor force by starting to look for work or move to a new state. The latter is the case in Pennsylvania—more people are entering the labor force, and most are getting jobs.
Here are some facts about Pennsylvania's growth:
- The number of employed persons grew by 143,537. Pennsylvania's growth rate was more than double the national average.
- Over the past year, Pennsylvania nearly matched the other 49 states combined in new labor force participants. PA's labor force growth rate was 17 times the growth in the other 49 states.
Last Two Years
- The number of employed persons grew by 165,997. Pennsylvania's growth rate was slightly higher than the national average.
- Pennsylvania's labor force growth rate was 4.5 times the growth in the other 49 states.
Corbett's Two Years vs. Rendell's Second Term
- Job growth (reported by employers, which differs somewhat from household survey data described above) was 91,100 over the past two years. From January 2007 to 2011, Pennsylvania lost 136,600 jobs.
- Pennsylvania's unemployment rate is down 0.1 percent since January 2011. It had grown 3.8 percent in the prior four years.
This trend shouldn't be surprising. The historical evidence demonstrates that government spending doesn't stimulate economic growth. Pennsylvania's jobs record demonstrates the old axiom that you can grow the economy or you can grow the government, but you can't grow both.
Will Bunch's column in the Philadelphia Daily News last week takes a very negative view of Pennsylvania's economic climate, based on the premise that the state unemployment rate is higher than the national average. My single quote in the piece bears expanding upon, as recent data shows Pennsylvania's labor force and the number of people employed is growing faster than the rest of the country.
The most recent state unemployment data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics—which showed Keystone State's unemployment rate fell 0.3 percent last month—rank Pennsylvania among the nation's employment leaders. While the number of unemployed persons has risen over the past year, so has the number of persons employed.
More dramatic is Pennsylvania's growth in labor force, defined as the number of people working or actively looking for work ("unemployed"). While the labor force has been stagnant nationally, Pennsylvania's labor force has been expanding. In fact, the commonwealth nearly matched the other 49 states in labor force growth over the past year.
Either large numbers of disgruntled workers are deciding to reenter the labor force and look for jobs, or people are coming to Pennsylvania to find employment. Perhaps we are doing something right after all.
Can Americans afford slower economic growth and a lower standard of living in the future? That will be the impact of growing government debt on the economy, according to a a policy brief released by the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
Michael J. Boskin explains:
How does a high debt-GDP ratio slow growth? Higher debt ratios eventually crowd out investment, as holdings of government debt replace capital in private portfolios. The lower tangible capital formation reduces future income. To the extent the reduced capital formation slows the development and dissemination of new technology, this effect will be amplified. Every dollar borrowed requires future interest be paid, whose present discounted value equals the debt. So future taxes must go up to cover the interest unless future spending is cut. The prospect and then reality of higher tax rates, plus increased uncertainty about future fiscal policy, slows growth and also raises the specter of higher inflation eroding the value of the government debt and/or a financial crisis, which might sharply raise interest rates.
So despite what some politicians claim, more government deficit spending and debt actually hurts the economy. What's needed for economic growth is private investment, not government investment.
What does lower economic growth mean? If the U.S. government continues to recklessly run up the debt, projections have the average family losing as much as 30 percent of their potential income by 2050. That is, families would be one-third poorer because of the burden of government debt.
Politicians like to set up a false choice between fiscal austerity and stimulating the economy, when in reality, the two aren't mutually exclusive. Debt or prosperity? It's our choice.
Last week saw the release of September state jobs data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Media coverage of this jobs report focused on the unemployment rate only, which shows an uptick in the state unemployment rate contrasted with an unexpected and surprising decline in the national unemployment rate.
However, looking beneath the headlines, the data shows Pennsylvania's job market actually outperformed the rest of the nation.
Keep in mind the jobs report uses two sets of surveys: One of 390,000 establishments (businesses) which is used to determine the number of "jobs," the second of 50,000 households used to calculate the number of persons employed, unemployed and in the labor force, along with the unemployment rate. These surveys often show different trends.
- In terms of jobs (establishment data), Pennsylvania added 17,800 jobs in September. This was the second highest in U.S. behind Texas. This represents an increase of 0.3 percent—triple the increase among all 50 states and D.C. (0.1 percent).
- Switching to household data, BLS shows Pennsylvania added 23,227 employed person in September, the 8th largest growth in nation. This is an increase of 0.4 percent, more than the 50-state growth of 0.3 percent.
- The data on the unemployed persons is where Pennsylvania trends diverge from the national average. According to BLS, Pennsylvania added 5,407 unemployed individuals, whereas the 50-state total shows 268,054 fewer unemployed persons (see footnote for some questions about this trend).
- However, what may really surprise readers is the growth in Pennsylvania's labor force. This is defined as the number of people employed or officially "unemployed" (meaning they are actively seeking work).
- In September, Pennsylvania added 28,364 individuals to the labor force. This was the third highest in U.S, and represents a growth rate four times the rest of the nation.
- Over the past year, Pennsylvania's labor force grew 130,400. Not only is that the second highest in U.S., the growth rate of 2 percent means the state labor force has grown at 18 times the national rate of growth.
- Over the past year, Pennsylvania was responsible for 74 percent of the 50-state labor force growth.
That is to say that Pennsylvania's unemployment rate is growing while the state is adding jobs because of growth in our labor force. Pennsylvania is one of few states where more people are actually trying to look for jobs, which includes those who had previously given up, and those coming to Pennsylvania to find a job, given our relatively strong jobs market.
 For comparison, I used the total of all 50-states plus the District of Columbia from the state and local employment and unemployment series, rather than the national employment and unemployment series, as there are data differences between the two sets. For example, the national unemployment data (which includes Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands) show 500,000 fewer unemployed persons than the state and local data set-lending credence to Jack Welch's claim that the BLS unemployment rate is unreliable.
Total Records: 238
Who are We?
The Commonwealth Foundation is Pennsylvania's free-market think tank. The Commonwealth Foundation crafts free-market policies, convinces Pennsylvanians of their benefits, and counters attacks on liberty.